OPINIONS
- People must be able to earn a living while they train for
a new job and must know that when their training has been
successfully completed they will be able to obtain the
type of job for which they are now qualified (or else be
compensated for their wasted effort).
- The market economy is making people's lives a misery,
particularly the lives of elderly people who were brought
up in much less prosperous times, didn't have the
educational opportunities enjoyed by younger people and
are unable to obtain them now.
- Unemployment is catastrophic for many people. Often it
isn't possible for them to get another job comparable
with their previous one at all, let alone quickly.
- People who accept a less senior and less well paid job as
a temporary stopgap usually find they have trapped
themselves in the "you are only as good as your last
job" dead end.
- Finding themselves a half decent new job is a nightmare
for many unemployed people over forty who have worked in
some high tech. professions such as electronics and IT
but haven't got very far up the greasy pole, nobody wants
to employ them at any price. Redundancy and unemployment
is an occupational hazard in the engineering profession
as manufacturing is given away to the Far Eastern
emerging economies and defence projects, about the only
remaining fairly healthy source of employment, wax, wane,
get postponed, cut back or cancelled.
- Provision needs to be made for professionals and semi-professionals
to do useful work or training to maintain their skills
and obtain some income while they are trying to find a
new job.
- Employers expect job applicants to have an improbable
range of skills, many more than they have themselves.
They are deluding themselves about their own abilities.
- Unemployed people must be paid a full wage so that the
Government is given an incentive to find them work.
- The unemployed shouldn't have to write begging letters to
employers, (people they probably despise and detest).
Most people don't change their job very often and do jobs
that don't give them the skills that enable them to
obtain new jobs easily, they need help to find suitable
work. There must be people whose job it is to find
suitable work for those needing it, these people would
need to have a good knowledge of the employers and
opportunities for people working in the occupation(s)
they cover.
- Employers are not the best people to decide how others
are employed and what they should be doing, they usually
put their own narrow interests first.
- When unemployed and losing money, people rapidly lose
confidence and become alienated and hostile: in this
society one has to be confident and contented to stand
any chance of getting a job.
- Being unemployed is an emergency that is probably more
serious than being injured in an accident; full
recoveries are made from most injuries whereas ground
lost due to unemployment is quite likely never to be made
up. There should be emergency services to get people back
into work appropriate to their skills and experience so
that they can earn a proper income and maintain their
skills. If necessary the employment services should ask
suitable companies to provide temporary work, at the
expense of the government, while a permanent position is
being sought. If retraining is required it must be
provided in an intensive form without delay (not after a
six month wait as seems to be the situation now).
- Most employers demand years of experience from job
applicants, few are prepared to provide it, except
grudgingly and if they are lucky, to the young who are
just starting out. Older people have virtually no chance
of changing tack or improving their situation, it is
intolerable. The Catch 22 situation of no experience so
no chance of a job and no job so no chance of getting
experience is never even tackled, let alone dealt with
satisfactorily. Either employers must be forced to take
on a certain quota of people who need experience or the
government must subsidise people while they are getting
on the job training, or both.
- It is no good for older people to learn anything in the
hope that it will help them to get a job. Every employer
wants a different combination of skills, if you don't
have that combination or a very similar combination you
are unlikely to get the job. This society is a Loaded
Lottery Society, the odds are heavily loaded against
anyone seeking a new job or career, especially if they
are getting on in years.
- An Australian scheme to encourage employers to take on
unemployed people by subsidising their wages wasn't
successful because employers were of the opinion that the
long term unemployed have low skill levels and a poor
attitude to work. (They probably had a poor attitude to
work because previous employers had given them no
opportunity to improve their skill levels or financial
circumstances. Also, long term unemployment and
consequent loss of earnings is bound to cause anger,
resentment and hostility to the system and employers
within it.)
- Provided people register as unemployed and accept any
reasonable job offered they should get full pay. This
would put pressure on the employment authorities to find
people suitable work quickly.
- If you want to work you mustn't say anything negative or
critical in your CV or at interview because employers
don't want critical employees, they want uncritical
suckers.
- Job applicants are usually in a much weaker position than
prospective employers, they need a job more urgently than
the employer needs staff as a rule. In normal
circumstances this is probably true even if the applicant
still has a job, if it is one he is trying to escape from.
- Workfare project work is slavery.
- The unemployed are blamed for unemployment, usually it
isn't their fault.
- Workstart benefit money is supposed to be used to
subsidise the wages of people who otherwise wouldn't have
been recruited but in practice, employers use the scheme
to subsidise their normal needs.
- Revolving door phenomenon - some people tend to be in and
out of jobs frequently. Many people find that due to lack
of the opportunity to get the qualifications and
experience they need, the only jobs they can get are an
insult to their intelligence and almost equally
intolerable, they can't endure them for more than a short
time.
- When a person is seriously dissatisfied with his/her job
he/she should be able to escape reasonably quickly
without risking a period of unemployment.
- In the Armed Services people are posted to a new position
at intervals so that they don't become stale or bored and
to maximise their usefulness, in civilian life many
people are virtually trapped in the same boring, go
nowhere job for life.
- People should be able to spend a short time in several
jobs before choosing to take one permanently.
- Unemployment is too important to be left to the private
sector to solve.
- People who fall out of work, for whatever reason, must be
able to get back in again quickly and easily.
- Sordid politicians don't take any account of the 'your
only as good as your last job' factor. Unemployed people
are being forced to take lousy jobs as a temporary
expedient only to find that they are trapped in a serf
for life situation. People are being forced to accept
whatever corrupt employers are prepared to give them,
this is tantamount to slavery.
- Jobcentres don't seem to keep any data on local
employers, they just sit back and wait for employers to
contact them with their serf requirements. They ought to
have a database of all the employers in their area, the
nature of their businesses and the different job skills
they use. (They have got quite good computer systems now
but nearly all the jobs on them are low paid, unskilled
or semi-skilled. There is next to nothing for
professionals or semi-professionals).
- Employment agencies probably have data but they won't
divulge it. They tend to reveal one suitable job at a
time, one possible employer at a time, they rarely give
an overall picture.
- Have co-operatives of workers who hire their labour to
employers on negotiated terms? Would get rigid manager /worker
divide?
- People who spend a 40hr week job hunting diligently
should get a proper economic wage, (many of the clerks
who work in employment agencies are called executives or
consultants and are paid much more than the professionals
whose time they usually waste).
- Employers shouldn't be allowed to hide their job
vacancies behind employment agencies.
- There should be an allocation system for jobs for those
who are not prepared to beg and crawl.
- The market system is supposed to match price to value:
according to the job market many people have no value at
all because no one will employ them at any price. NOT
TRUE most would be employable at a sub subsistence wage.
- Anybody who shows they resent being treated as a serf is
likely to find themselves unemployable.
- The jobs market is madness, it isn't a proper market, in
many fields people can't improve their chance of getting
work by reducing the price of their labour because it is
counter-productive, the people controlling employment
don't want low wage interlopers undermining their high
salaries.
- Many people with good jobs do little more than keep their
seats warm but an applicant looking for their job or one
similar has little chance of displacing them, squatters
rights usually prevail.
- People who become out of work must be fixed up with
something more or less immediately, training or work. The
longer people remain out of work the more debilitated
they become.
- Business should pay the full cost of unemployment it
creates (ie by making people redundant, shifting
production offshore etc.) so that it is given an
incentive to provide full employment.
- Nobody should have to endure the nightmare of being out
of work and dependent on subsistence benefits. There
should be expert councillors with whom to discuss future
plans and to facilitate meetings with possible employers.
- The quest for optimum efficiency is shutting millions out
of employment and society, those who are in work should
compensate those they shut out and deprive of their share
of prosperity.
- When they get power, young people close the door to older
people .
- Employment agencies aren't fulfilling their proper
function, they are a barrier to job applicants, not a
benefit. They work for the employers, doing their dirty
work for them, weeding out people who aren't enthusiastic
about taking jobs that reduce them to being powerless
serfs.
- The Government needs to know what is going on in the job
market so that it can make sure that the population knows
which skills are in demand, which are not, which are well
paid, which are not etc. and so that appropriate
education opportunities, incentives and disincentives are
provided in a timely way. For this reason and also to
make job seeking much easier and cheaper for the
unemployed, the Government should perform the employment
agency function and make sure it is done properly with
proper use of computer technology.
- Help with relocation expenses should be provided whenever
necessary (but not when people abuse this provision).
- It isn't feasible for elderly people to change their
career or even their job, very few employers want to
employ them at all. They have no hope of starting a new
career in which they have little or no experience, it is
unreasonable to expect them to try. If they lose their
job they are done for, they have little chance of getting
another one that isn't menial, degrading, slave labour.
Special provision has to be made for the elderly to
enable them to continue to earn a living comparable to
that enjoyed by the young.
- It must be made possible to get worthwhile training while
working whatever one's age.Most of the jobs that the
agencies which serve the professions advertise and handle
are at the top end, for senior people with improbably
wide experience. How are people in the lower and, more
particularly, the middle parts of the spectrum supposed
to find jobs, there is no efficient way to do it? In any
case, employers only seem to want to take on beginners
they can train for middle rank roles and experts, they
don't want to have anything to do with retraining anybody
really.
- People who have been in the same job for years are
unlikely to have the skills needed to change to another
job successfully.
- Unemployed people shouldn't have to go through the
torture of writing sycophantic begging letters to
prospective employers they don't really want to even know
about let alone work for in order to get the chance to
earn a derisory, humiliatingly low income.
- If one changes jobs too often one becomes unemployable,
employers want faithful serfs not people who will put
them to the trouble and cost of finding new serfs and
giving them a few hours training.
- If one loses one's chair in the game of musical chairs
one is out and can't be allowed back in.
- Unemployment quickly turns into a nightmare that nobody
should have to suffer.
- Unemployment is crippling and destructive, it must be
made impossible for people to become unemployed. If
people can't bear their jobs they must be found new, more
satisfactory ones within a certain period or be given
training for a new one. If necessary, firms must be
forced or paid to take people on and find them something
useful to do so that they can maintain their skills. The
government must provide funds for this.
- Only exceptional people will be able to earn more then £50K
pa.
- The unemployed have to flounder around to get a job, it's
largely a matter of luck whether they manage to get one
that is suitable for them. Like everything else in this
society, it is a lottery.
- Switching from one job to another is difficult, it should
be made a more gradual process. People should be able to
work part-time in the place they are proposing to leave
and the place they are proposing to join, tidying up
their affairs in one and finding their bearings in the
other. It should be possible to cancel the change at any
time in the transition process if things don't work out
as expected.
- To escape from a job one doesn't like in a reasonable
time it is usually necessary to take a step down in
status, once one has done that it becomes almost
impossible ever to take a step back up again.
- Leaving one job before getting another also spoils one's
chances of getting a decent job. Breaks from serving our
masters are not allowed.
- There is no way to get training for a lot of the jobs on
the market now, they are so specialised there are no
courses designed to prepare people for doing them, one
has to have worked somewhere where one was able to get
experience.
- The government says we will have to change our job or
career more than once in our working lives but employers
make it almost impossible to change jobs, they are so
picky. They won't employ people unless they have just the
right qualifications and experience, nearly all of them
want a different combination. When one gets past a
certain age it is virtually impossible to get another job
of any quality.
- These days there is much more work available that is
suitable for women than there is for men.
- A lot of the jobs that are available are hidden from most
people.
- Job seekers should have the right to visit companies they
think they might like to work for and look around.
- The professions are as guilty of closed shop tactics as
the Unions ever were.
- Many technical jobs are so specialised these days that
losing one's job is totally disastrous, there is almost
no chance of getting anything similar and every chance
one will fall to the bottom of the heap with little
chance of making a recovery.
- Employment agencies don't seem to communicate with each
other very much, if at all, even when they are different
branches of the same firm. Their staff seem to be
determined to keep their business strictly to themselves
even if it damages their clients, for commission reasons
no doubt. This is very much against the interests of job-seekers.
- A lot of employment agency staff seem to be called
consultants or executives and get salaries commensurate
with their titles but very few seem to be capable of
understanding the sort of work people are looking for.
- If you try to start a business and fail you are in deep
trouble. Employers don't want to employ you because they
think you will soon try to start another business and
that you have ideas above your station (and may be a
threat to them).
- Employment agencies are a barrier between employers and
job seekers. They won't help a lot of people to get jobs
because they know they can't make a profit out of them,
they won't divulge any useful information to them, like
names and addresses of local firms, either. They are the
curse of the job seeker.
- To get a job most of us have to feed the egos of the
damned filth who think they have the right to decide who
works and who doesn't, who has a life and who has a
subsistence.
- Getting a new job is far more difficult than keeping one already held;
it shouldn't be. If one has become unemployed, getting a new job
comparable with one's previous one is even more difficult.
- If one takes a low grade job as a stopgap, one is likely to fall into
the "you are only as good as your last job trap" and get stuck
in it for life.
- In a service economy there are very few jobs that a person with any
ability could possibly want. Service jobs are generally routine, giving
virtually no scope for creativity, enterprise, innovation or satisfaction.
The life of a peasant is probably more rewarding and fulfilling than that
of a service industry worker but why should our lords and masters care?
- Many people have virtually no value outside the company they work for,
if it goes to the wall so do they. There is virtually no provision for
retraining people who find themselves in this situation so that they can
get a new job comparable to their previous one. They are expected to
accept relegation to low paid, unskilled work with good grace.