ISLAM CHRISTIANITY JUDAISM Topic Index
  1. Islam obviously owes a lot to the Bible, it recognises the Jewish prophets and Jesus Christ as a prophet (but not as the son of God, Islam regards this as blasphemy, God can't be subdivided). It's main criticism of Judaism is that the Jews killed some of the prophets (Jesus Christ and John the Baptist). Muhammed obviously couldn't embrace Judaism or Christianity, adoption of another group's religion implies an acceptance of inferiority, the inability to find or develop one's own. Generally speaking, each race, tribe or group has to have it's own religion or it's own variation of another group's religion so that it can regard itself as superior, or at least equal in creativity and perception. Hence Muhammed improved on the Bible by removing most of the myth, history and verbiage from it and concentrating on straightforward moral and practical guidance, hammered home by a super-heavyweight carrot and stick. The carrot being bright eyed houris in Paradise, the stick the flames of Hell.
  2. Allah seems to delight in sending to eternal torment in a furnace people who don't believe in him and don't respect him as he thinks he deserves, he appears to be more like a devil than a god.
  3. Those who behave as Muhammed says Allah requires us to behave are rewarded, by Allah, according to Muhammed, with an eternal life of luxury in Paradise and a plentiful supply of gorgeous young virgins. This doesn't seem to be a very exalted reward but, even today, the average, not very bright male promised the alternatives of a furnace if he doesn't behave as he is told to or virgins if he does, by a charismatic, authoritative leader, as Muhammed almost certainly was, would decide to take the second alternative in case the promise was well founded.
  4. It is common practise for tribal leaders to use the postulated authority of gods, spirits or other jujus to extend their own, how can we tell whether Muhammed was any different? There have been numerous charlatans who have started religions from a very flimsy basis, the latest is probably Rael, leader of the Raelian cult (who claims that the human race is descended from a cloned alien visitor from another planet). All we have to distinguish confidence tricksters from the genuine article is evidence and our reasoning powers. Expecting us to have faith that something that seems highly improbable is true is ludicrous. We have been caught out many times and anyway, why would a God give us reasoning powers if he wanted us to rely on blind faith?
  5. Islam seems to be an extreme case of a religion that is designed to ensure it's own survival, it is designed to trap anybody who adopts it, it attempts to plug every possible escape route with the threat and fear of death and hell fire. Muhammed was probably consciously trying to design a religion that would be more powerful and effective than Judaism or Christianity so that his followers would be more fanatical, more convinced that they could win any conflict with people of those faiths and hence be more likely to. He probably saw himself as an intellectual warrior as well as the conventional sort, a philosopher and potent juju conceiver, many leaders do.
  6. How do we know Muhammed wasn't using drugs to get his inspiration? An expert opinion is needed on whether the style of the language of the Koran is consistent with drug use. Bubble pipes are popular in the Arab world aren't they, for how long has this been the case? What is smoked in them? For how long has Afghanistan been the centre of opium production in the Middle East? What is the history of drug use in the Middle East, has it been pervasive?
  7. There are a number of places in the Koran where, according to Muhammed, Allah anticipates that his audience might consider Muhammed to be mad, Allah apparently assures us he isn't but he is speaking through the person who might be mad so how can this assurance be relied on? Surely it is better for people to face up to reality rather than living in cloud cuckoo land; to accept that our fate depends largely on our own actions and there is little or no irrefutable evidence that a God ever intervenes on our behalf.
      RESPONSE FORM