CRISES AND SCANDALS Topic Index
British Industry Catastrophe Legal Profession Scandal Education Scandal

BRITISH INDUSTRY,  IMMINENT MELT-DOWN

  1. Corus, the company that took over (or amalgamated with?) British Steel, is expected to report a loss of £400 million today and probably the closure of another of this country's steel plants. It's share price has fallen to 4p. Perhaps now would be a good time for the British Government to quickly organise the purchase of this company while this can be done for a knock down price. A Dutch steel plant could then be closed instead of another one of ours (Corus is Anglo/Dutch but the Dutch seem to have control at the top). The Government could show a little of the entrepreneurship they admire so much and arrange a Public/ Private Partnership to do this but they won't, they know they can't benefit from such a deal in the way that a poisonous, greedy entrepreneur would so they won't bother. They will probably leave it to their Indian billionaire friend who lives in Hampstead to carve up our steel industry even more comprehensively than the Dutch (it is probably partly his companies that are destroying it, see below).
  2. Alternatively, the Government could just buy the steel plant that is to be closed down, for a song, or seize it in the national interest to prevent it being destroyed. The Government allows foreign firms to take over our assets and then destroy them to reduce the competition with their own. We already import 60% of our steel, the way things are going the figure will soon be 100%, Soon there will be no way of reviving or saving any of our manufacturing industry, we will be dependent on foreign sources for all our goods. The only choice of work for most of the population will be selling, clerking and cleaning. Our balance of payments position will soon become horrendous and we will quickly sink to Third World status. I don't believe any other European country has thrown in the sponge and sold out to other countries like we have; France, Germany and Italy have all managed to protect their industry to a much larger extent than we have ours. We practise Free Trade but nobody else does, our industry is being wiped out, nobody else's is. We even boast about the amount of foreign investment we get by bribing foreign companies to come here to save us from the failures of our own.
  3. Japan has never practised Free Trade. I spent a week there ten to fifteen years ago and don't think I saw a single foreign car on the Japanese streets, I expect the situation is much the same today. I don't think I saw a single black person in Japan either, they don't burden themselves with immigrants or asylum seekers, I don't think they take any. They have been in recession for over ten years but their industries are still wiping the floor with ours.
  4. Actually, judging by a report I have just heard on today’s one o’clock news (14/3/03), our steel industry is as much a dead duck as nearly all of our other industries. Surprise, surprise, it is principally the Chinese again. They and, in this case, the South Americans too, can produce steel for a fraction of the price we can. It looks as though it is as futile to try to compete in this industry as in most others. Capitalism and the market are now threatening to collapse everything except, perhaps, our kitchen furniture and conservatory industries. It is almost time to turn this country into a theme park for the entertainment of the populations of the dynamic, advanced, South East Asian countries, or has somebody got a better idea?
  5. The dozy, ignorant half-wits who govern us don't care if all of our industries go down the tubes, it won’t be their jobs, careers and chances of making a decent living that disappear. They are doing alright, they will get a cosy sinecure in the City, the House of Lords or Europe if they get turfed out of office. Even John Major seems to have found himself a nice little number and the Kinnocks are doing very nicely indeed out of our membership of the EU. Hurrah for them. Some say.

THE LEGAL PROFESSION SCANDAL                TOP

The Who Wants To Be A Millionaire Trial

  1. Why does this trial have to take up so much expensive court and lawyer time? Who pays for it and do they pay all the expense or is some of it born by the tax-payer? These programmes that offer prizes of large amounts of money for doing very little should be against the law, they are corrupt.
  2. There is no need for these big prizes, they don't make the programmes any more entertaining, they make them more ridiculous. They are designed to make the programmes appeal to the mentally challenged section of the population.
  3. Mastermind, University Challenge, Brain of Britain (Radio 4) and Round Britain Quiz (R4) hardly give prizes at all do they and they don’t have triple choice questions that can be guessed with a 33% chance of getting the right answer. The programme is only fit for morons who want to believe that one day they will be lucky, a completely unmerited fortune will fall out of the sky into their laps and they will be able to indulge all their greedy, extravagant, self-indulgent fantasies with no thought or concern for anybody else's problems. Or, another sort of moron who enjoys seeing the goony grins of the above sort of morons when they win. Or, yet another sort of moron who enjoys the synthetic "happy, clappy isn't this fun" way in which this type of programme is presented.

The Catherine Zeta Jones Trial

  1. What a tragedy, Mrs Douglas has caught the Hollywood variant of celebrity disease. A magazine has published smudgy photographs of her wedding that were taken by a gate crashing photographer, how terribly distressing, surely a million pounds in damages can't be enough compensation for such an enormous injury? I expect her wedding was a sordid, disgusting display of extravagance, self-indulgence and narcissism anyway. I expect there are as many people begging on the streets of New York in order to survive as there are on the streets of London, they have no chance of a £54 million contract for being the puppet of film directors for three years like the one she has been given but why should she give a damn about that. Getting another million for the small glitch in her wedding arrangements is far more important, it might refill the coffers to their level before the bash. In any case, she will probably be getting married again in two years time and several more times after that so she needn't be short of opportunities to get everything absolutely to her satisfaction on at least one occasion. She and her husband should go back to cesspit Hollywood and stay there living the American Deluded Nightmare (as far as most of us are concerned) until, hopefully, their disease subsides. Until then, they will be despised by most people with more than two functioning brain cells.
  2. Our courts shouldn’t be bunged up for weeks for trivial nonsense cases like this one, it doesn’t seem to merit even half a day of court time. It should be sufficient to bring the opposing parties together face to face in a locked room together with an arbitrator and not let them out or have any refreshment until they have come to the most mutually satisfactory agreement they can. If they can’t come to any agreement in two hours the arbitrator should impose a stiff fine on both parties, slap their wrists and dismiss the case.

The Omagh Bombing Legal Process

  1. According to a newspaper report (Sun.Tel. 9/3/03) nearly all of £1.2 million pounds raised to finance a private prosecution of five suspects thought to be responsible for the Omagh Bombing has now been spent. It is estimated that a further £840,000 needs to be raised to take the case to court. Nearly all this money is going on legal fees, 50% or more on preparation of the case. The solicitor in charge is paid £4 per minute for his services; nice work if you can get it. What on earth does he do that merits this sort of income? Most or all of the material this individual is working with, a police report, police interviews, witness statements, hundreds of logs of telephone calls made by the Real IRA bomb team and secretly recorded film used in the identification of the suspects, was collected for a BBC Panorama programme presented two and a half years ago. It was all handed over, the solicitor hasn’t had to find it for himself. I don’t believe he is much more than a clerk. This looks like a case of vultures gorging on the corpses of victims of an atrocity; what do you think? How does this solicitor defend himself? Apparently he has chosen Matrix, the London chambers specialising in human rights, to provide the barristers who will be needed. Matrix was set up with the Prime Minister’s wife, Cherie Booth QC, as a founding partner and she was reputed to "earn" £500k pa several years ago. Maybe she too will get some tasty carrion from this case. Workers in manufacturing industry are trying to compete against Malaysian workers who are paid £1.5/hr (by the Dyson vacuum cleaner company) and Chinese workers who are probably paid less, yet lawyers, whose abilities don’t extend much further than the almost universal ones of reading, writing and speaking, think they are worth £4 a minute (this is a 20% discounted rate by the way). We should all be able to enrol on law courses straight away so that we can all enjoy the bonanza, why have we been duped into taking up other careers?
  2. If manufacturing industry must face competition from South East Asia then so should the legal profession. A lot of accountancy, software and call centre work is being exported to India, it seems that about the only thing that will educate lawyers to their real worth will be competition from either there or, even better, China. What a delicious spectacle squealing lawyers would make for those of us who worked in manufacturing (and most other non-lawyers), it would almost compensate us for our own pain. The legal profession, like the medical profession, is probably as sordid and corrupt as the criminal fraternity and a bigger burden on society. They both pose as saintly defenders and protectors of those in trouble while, in fact, they greedily exploit their vulnerability.
  3. The suspects in this case all live in the Irish Republic and, apparently, compelling defendants to cross the border to attend civil trials is unheard of. Also, if a "default" judgement was given against them it would be difficult to enforce south of the border, it therefore appears that all this expenditure is likely to achieve virtually nothing. It would seem to be desirable for Tony Blair to have words with Bertie Aherne on the subject of giving sanctuary to terrorist atrocity suspects.

THE EDUCATION SCANDAL                                   TOP

The argument about positive discrimination to help students from disadvantaged backgrounds to get university places.

  1. A French journalist on the panel of the Any Questions programme (BBC Radio 4) a week or two ago said that there are no private schools in France nor in Germany, Holland or Sweden; I get the impression there are few if any in the United States either. All of these countries are more successful and prosperous than ours, their citizens have a higher standard of living (on average) than we enjoy. Our education system cannot possibly be just when some children get vastly superior education facilities to others.
  2. There are still millions of people in work who were brought up in the hard times just after the Second World War and who never had the slightest chance of going to university. Many have been stuck in low wage, no hope jobs all their lives with minimal chance of ever escaping. They are now expected to endure, without complaint, the sight of young people leaving university and immediately being paid twice as much as they have ever been able to earn. If they lose their job when they are getting on in years they have to beg and grovel to get another one, even a menial serf position. It is sick, Sick, SICK.
  3. How many times have we been told that jobs aren’t for life any more, that we may have to change our occupation several times during our working lives? What provision has been made to make this feasible without severe financial and other difficulties? Virtually none.
  4. The emphasis now must be on access to worthwhile, affordable, relevant education throughout life for all, not on feeding  the egos of the spoilt brats of the prosperous classes and giving them an enjoyable scive/ romantic interlude before they belatedly start doing some real work.
  5. What do we need graduates for? There is little point studying most technical subjects, they are a passport to poverty because our industries are being wiped out by the Far Eastern economies. People who work in engineering and technology cannot be paid ridiculous salaries like lawyers because they are trying to compete against their counterparts in low wage economies (with little chance of success; some very able people may survive a bit longer but few others are likely to.)
  6. Most non-technical subjects are a sham, there is no need to go to university to study them, success in them signifies virtually nothing.
  7. Most of the jobs provided by a service economy can be handled very satisfactorily by eleven year old primary school leavers.
  8. Most education is an almost complete waste of time, it is never used productively. Nearly everything I was taught at grammar school and then in the first year of an engineering degree course has been of no use to me since and was forgotten long ago. Learning Latin was a complete waste of time, it has never been of any use to me and I forgot 99% of it years ago. French has been almost equally useless to me so far and is likely to continue to be so, I can’t afford the time to try to revive or maintain my slight remaining knowledge of it. I don’t think the history I was taught at school has ever been of any practical use to me, it now seems to have been mostly kid’s stuff and more or less irrelevant to life in the present day, I don’t recall being taught anything much later than the French Revolution for example. All that most people need is one or two good history books for reference and access to a library and book shops, in fact, most people’s history needs are met by television. Geography is much the same, I have a large atlas and that meets most of my needs. I have never made any use of the chemistry I learned to 'A’ Level or much of the physics and maths either. The first year of the engineering degree course was common to civil, electrical and mechanical engineering students and mostly consisted of subjects like mechanics of machines, strength of materials, thermodynamics and hydraulics which I have never used and am not very likely to now since electronics and computing have been my main interests. At the end of that year I was so depressed I was a hospital case and for that and other reasons I dropped out of the course and found that after three years higher education I still hadn’t even started to study the subject that most interested me. A few years later I managed to get a job with an engineering company and day release to study for an HNC in electrical and electronic engineering. Only a small part of that course was relevant to the work I have done subsequently.
  9. Education, education, education, humbug, humbug, humbug, corruption, corruption, corruption. The purpose of the ridiculously extended, full-time, education process is to make sure that children from poor families cannot complete it so can never qualify for the highly paid jobs the prosperous classes want to make sure their children get.
  10. According to a recent newspaper report, plumbers and other tradesmen can now get a higher income than professors and the same is probably true of near-illiterate double-glazing, kitchen, conservatory and most other sorts of salesmen. Some graduates, accountants and the like are now training to be plumbers, apparently, and could earn up to £60k or even £100k pa. Of course, to really hit the jackpot one has to be a footballer, pornographer, drug dealer, vice trader, wheeler-dealer or businessman.
  11. The main purpose of the education industry is to keep a substantial section of the middle class in comfortable employment, whether this education serves any useful purpose is largely irrelevant. People are encouraged to stuff themselves with knowledge regardless of whether it is going to be of any use to them or whether there is going to be any demand for their services when they have obtained a qualification. Knowledge is also thought to be good in itself as well as in it’s function of keeping people busy. Nobody really knows what the demand for the various skills is now, or will be in the future, it is all left to chance and the market. Eventually it becomes obvious that there is a glut or a famine, ie. when it is too late to correct the situation without pain to the individuals affected. In nearly every facet of life this is a sordid, lottery society.

TOP